User talk:29T92

Some of your edits
Please note that one or more images you have uploaded have been deleted as they were already uploaded previously, making the copies you uploaded redundant.

Also I've had to remove some categories that you've been adding to articles, as they were either redundant, or unapproved by community consensus.

While I appreciate that you're working hard to improve the wiki, I would advise you to slow down a bit because I've noticed that a few of your edits have made changes that have been deemed unnecessary.

I'm not trying to discourage you though, and I do hope this doesn't discourage you from editing here. ― C.Syde ( talk  |  contribs ) 09:44, April 8, 2017 (UTC)


 * I've also noticed that you've removed a few images from galleries that shouldn't have been removed. If you are in doubt as to whether those images are needed, you may want to start a discussion on the article's talk page instead. Thanks! :) ― C.Syde ( talk  |  contribs ) 10:11, April 8, 2017 (UTC)


 * It's okay. I know but it's like to not have English as a first language, since English is my first language, yet I'm not very fluent with anything else. If any pictures are in low-quality, they usually shouldn't be removed unless someone manages to find a better copy of the same image.


 * Also with categories, if you know how to check to see if a category already exists, I'd advise you to stick only to adding already existing categories, since we're currently trying to narrow down the number of categories we have here, and we don't want any additions of categories that are "too specific".


 * Categories such as "Crash Bandicoot The Wrath of Cortex Enemies" and "Crash Bandicoot 3 Warped Levels" should not be added to articles as they are too specific, and they fit just fine under the respective "Enemies" and "Levels" categories. ― C.Syde ( talk  |  contribs ) 05:30, April 9, 2017 (UTC)


 * The problem is that it was decided about a year ago that those sorts of categories shouldn't be added since it was decided that categories like that are too specific for inclusion. I too believe that it makes it easier to navigate, but the consensus was that those categories were too specific to keep so those sorts of categories were removed from articles. ― C.Syde ( talk  |  contribs ) 09:13, April 9, 2017 (UTC)