User talk:Dr Rank

Re: Elora Trivia
My logic is pretty self-explanatory. A side character being playable for the first time is hardly something worth noting when that character isn't even from the series, nor is it relevant how long it has been around for when, again, it's not from this series. It's even more irrelevant to bring up a game that, once again, is not from this series, to talk about it more. -- 22:32, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Re:
"I'm pretty sure you can't delete content just because you don't like it." I can, actually. It's like, the point of being admin on a wiki. Myself and the others do get to decide what content stays on the wiki and we remove content we think is inappropriate. I removed it because it's extremely minor and not that interesting (it could literally have just been a typo). To copy-paste something our partners wrote regarding "trivia" sections:

Lots of wikis on Fandom and elsewhere (note: not Wikipedia, for good reason) include ==Trivia== sections with bullet point information of facts about the article. People like the facts in these sections, but there's two points to consider for why these sections have no place on an encyclopedia:

-If something is trivial, it is not notable enough to include on the page. -If something IS notable enough to include on the page, it's not trivial.

Due to these key points, Trivia sections, i.e. things that store a list of trivial information, have no place on an encyclopedia, and no place on a wiki with good quality standards. Furthermore, the sections are problematic because they invite lazy spam of facts into bullet points that either do belong elsewhere on the page, or included no sources/citations and did not belong there. The useful info in these sections often belongs in the article itself, whether it be in a ==Behind the scenes== section, a notable point in the lede, or a point in the equivalent of the ==Characteristics== section. The useless info should be reverted.

09:52, 29 November 2023 (UTC)