User talk:C.Syde65

{|width="100%" style="background: maroon; border-radius: 1em"
 * valign="top" width="50%" style="background: #f9ecc3; border: 3px; padding: .5em 1em; border-radius: 1em"|

Introduction
I am RebeccaTheSorceress, your friendly user and I am very pleased to meet you. For my favourite Bandicoot is Coco Bandicoot, Because She is beautiful and clever. My favourite villain is Doctor N Gin, Because He is Clever, I like his Cybernetic voice as well as his foreign accent, because it's very cute. (RebeccaTheSorceress (talk) 01:32, February 8, 2014 (UTC))


 * Thank you, C.Syde65. (RebeccaTheSorceress (talk) 05:53, February 9, 2014 (UTC))

Re: Dingodile in N-Tranced
I've never seen Dingodile make a cameo in N-Tranced. I'll check the game's multiplayer and if it's true then I'll add the category back to the page. BaronZylo (talk) 03:19, February 22, 2014 (UTC)

Hiya
I think I recalled some time ago that you are a fan of Crash too. I love the originals! They're pretty fun to play! CotT and MoM are like turning Sims into Urbz; everything we know about Sims are no longer relevant, even though they're considered Sims games! On a different side, CotT and MoM have multiplayer mode, which is the only reason I'd play this game because I'd play it with my little brother.  Nikel  Talk  15:12, February 23, 2014 (UTC)

N. Trance's Personality
I have proof read it, its fantastic maybe more Info would be nice--Puddingch42 &#34; Good evening everyone i am Pudding&#34; (talk) 03:13, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

CTR / CNK Player Stats
That's because they're in a class of their own having each stats maxed out so we can't say they're beginners, intermidiets or advanced. SuperSubSpeed (talk) 17:00, February 27, 2014 (UTC)


 * Well no, since we can't play as Oxide and since Uka Uka is your guide in adventure mode if you picked Cortex, Ngin, Tiny or Dingodile. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by SuperSubSpeed (talk • contribs) - Please sign your comments with ~

RE: Pinstripe in Crash Team Racing
Some of their voices are still stuck on my head. :p  Nikel  Talk  11:19, March 3, 2014 (UTC)

Re: Watermarked Images
delivered by owl

A person can try Google's reverse image search to see if anything turns up. If a picture without the watermark doesn't exist then it still doesn't get put into the articles/galleries. It's just number seven of Bandipedia's policy: "Don't copy watermarked images from any website." BaronZylo (talk) 07:03, March 4, 2014 (UTC)


 * There have been watermarked images uploaded on here from before I started editing. It's just a matter of finding them and then removing them from the articles (if they're used somewhere besides the mainspace) or deleting them (only being used in the mainspace and nowhere else on here). As for removing the watermark, if someone were to do that then the picture probably wouldn't be removed. After all, the issue is just the watermarks themselves. BaronZylo (talk) 07:18, March 4, 2014 (UTC)

Fake Crash Image
It looks fine now. You did a good job. BaronZylo (talk) 23:42, October 19, 2014 (UTC)

RE: Bandipedia design
Thanks Bandi Cooper 21:35, October 22, 2014 (UTC)

Fake Crash's info box image
I think it's better to do an image of him in CNK because A: It's his latest appearence and B: The image from N-Trance is unclear. Scheepybird (talk) 17:17, February 16, 2015 (UTC)

Re: SimsContributor100
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. However, it seems that Staff have already taken care of things as there is a notice stating that the user's account has been blocked across the Wikia network. BaronZylo (talk) 05:08, April 20, 2015 (UTC)

Bumping dead forums
As you should hopefully be aware, (and if you're not I'm really sorry, the Community Messages notification sometimes vanishes) the Community Messages states that you shouldn't bump dead forums. While you didn't do this specifically, you replied to someone who had just bumped a dead forum, when really you should have come to one of us to deal with the problem. It's no major issue as it's a common mistake made on Bandipedia, but if you could please check before you post on forums if it has been bumped or if you would be bumping it (cutoff point is around 3 weeks for non-stickied threads) it really helps. Thanks! 20:03, May 18, 2015 (UTC)

Reply to "One of your edits on the Ripper Roo page"
Hello, I apologize for not explaining the reasoning behind that one edit I made on the article. My name is FawFayQ8, and it's a pleasure to be speaking to you. My favorite characters in the Crash franchise are Ripper Roo for his wild and crazy personality and design and Tiny Tiger for his ferocity and strength. My reasoning for putting him as neutral was that although he did antagonize Crash Bandicoot in the first and second games, he has also done so to Dr. Neo Cortex in the second game. In addition, he hasn't targeted anyone else beyond Crash Bandicoot. Not Coco, Pura, Polar or even Crunch Bandicoot. Yes he was an antagonist and boss character, but what makes a character truly evil are his/her ulterior motives. Beyond being insane and uncontrollable, which he can't help, he lacks anything other than that. Antagonist and Villain do not necessarily mean the same thing. An antagonist can be heroic or non-villainous too (See the cops in GTA for example). Feel free to discuss further, I don't mind any further responses. Thank you. FawFayQ8 (talk) 09:06, February 28, 2016 (UTC)


 * N.Brio never said in Crash Bandicoot 2 that he wanted to take over the world, he said he wanted to save it, which is evident in the ending where he explained to Crash and Coco that the crystals are not the only materials used to power machines, but gems as well. He used them for his satellite that would destroy Cortex's machine. Yes Ripper Roo is very intelligent, but since Cortex considered him to be a failure due to his mental instability, which would make controlling him almost impossible, and adding to the fact that Cortex is a scientific genius, it would be questionable if he actually used him to defeat Crash. He would have most likely thrown him out too (check the trivia page in his article for more details). Furthermore, he hasn't been active in pursuing Crash as of Twinsanity, and has no other reason to fight him, which is why we don't see him again after his cameo in said game. FawFayQ8 (talk) 09:51, February 28, 2016 (UTC)


 * It's true that Brio was on Uka Uka's team in Crash Bash, which didn't make any sense. Then again, this is the same game in which Tiny Tiger and Dingodile, two antagonists, were made to be on Aku Aku's team with the bandicoots. Moreover, it is doubtful that the game is canon, as it doesn't follow the story of Crash Bandicoot 3, while The Wrath of Cortex did. It was mostly a mini-game collection for all intents and purposes. On an unrelated note, it's great to find another Gryffindor like myself, I was confirmed as one by Pottermore a few years ago and still browse it every now and then. Keep roaring! FawFayQ8 (talk) 10:31, February 28, 2016 (UTC)

RE: RE: Rilla Roo
The "original" PS1 games are Crash 1-3. -- 03:09, March 30, 2016 (UTC)

Rollbacking
Yeah, the rollback feature is quicker and more convenient for undoing unconstructive edits. If I have to clean up after you I'm going to do it in the quickest way possible, regardless of whether you think it's "acceptable" or not, because I don't recall you having the authority to call the shots in regards to people's methods of editing around here. Now what isn't acceptable is you slapping more of those awful niche categories onto articles when there is a campaign going on atm to get rid of those - it's gotten to the stage where one of the admins has had to a bot to help clean it up because the workload's so large. I've also noticed you undoing some of the bot's edits, which really isn't acceptable :v Bandi Cooper 12:28, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * I'm just saying, because that is what rollback is intended for - reverting vandalism and blatant bad faith edits. Using rollback indicates that the previous user made a blatant bad faith edit, hence no edit summary was given. It even says so in the Wikia help pages. Also I didn't intentionally undo any bot edits. I don't recall undoing any of them either. Can you present some examples where I may have undone some bot edits? If I really have undone some bot edits, it wasn't my intention. ―  C.Syde  ( talk &#124;  contribs ) 12:36, June 23, 2016 (UTC)
 * I was wrong about you undoing bot edits, but that arose from you adding a bad category to an article that the bot edited. Bandi Cooper 12:58, June 23, 2016 (UTC)

Re:
Yup - it's a user box thing. We're cracking down on categories and ideally the categories are for articles rather than user pages. If you want to make a user box for it as a template, then feel free, that would be the better option imo. 11:09, August 20, 2016 (UTC)