Talk:Polar

High Quality Article?
No offense, but seriously? A high quality article? The titles sound a bit too informal, a few grammar errors were found, not to mention the writing itself needs more information. Luckily, I cleaned it up a bit, but it still has some work to do &hearts;Warner Bandicoot&hearts; 19:12, March 8, 2011 (UTC)

I agree it should be medium quality but not high quality.Crashfreak99 19:34, March 8, 2011 (UTC)


 * I'd rather ditch the quality labels for each article. On the other wiki I am an admin on, we do not use these type of labels to denote the quality of the article. If we feel that the article is poor, we use a "stub" or "cleanup" tag. If we feel that the article is high quality, we nominate it for a featured article rather than calling it high quality. I think we should just do away with the labels as they do not describe accurately quality of the article. -- The Magnum Master 19:48, March 8, 2011 (UTC)
 * I completely agree about the quality labels. It would probably disinterest a reader if they see an article that is labeled as "Poor". We could seriously use a Feature Article voting page and keep track which article was voted a Feature Article. &hearts;Warner Bandicoot&hearts; 01:28, March 9, 2011 (UTC)
 * I completely agree about the quality labels. It would probably disinterest a reader if they see an article that is labeled as "Poor". We could seriously use a Feature Article voting page and keep track which article was voted a Feature Article. &hearts;Warner Bandicoot&hearts; 01:28, March 9, 2011 (UTC)